A methodological proposal for the integral management of maritime ports

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Jiménez, Luis Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGiner Fillol, Arturo
dc.contributor.authorRipoll Feliu, Vicente
dc.date2019-12-04
dc.descriptionGlobalization has its support in the international exchange of goods, where maritime ports play a key role, so the competitiveness of countries is determined by the ability of these nodes of the global network to meet the demands of the various actors who demand their services. World classifications are periodically published on the performance of maritime ports, taking into account quantitative factors, while giving less importance to other criteria that the actors of the port logistics chain value for their qualification. In this regard, this research paper presents a comprehensive evaluation model with eight criteria, following the multicriteria methodology with the Thomas Saaty technique, with a weighting of dominance among the criteria assigned by sector experts through an online survey. It is provided a practical example with five ports to demonstrate that the best ports adequately combine the various criteria to achieve the goal o providing quality services, ensuring that ships and containers stay as little timeas possible in their facilities.en-US
dc.descriptionLa globalización tiene su soporte en el intercambio internacional de mercancías, donde los puertos marítimos desarrollan un papel clave, por lo que la competitividad de los países está determinada por la capacidad que tengan estos nodos de la red mundial para satisfacer las exigencias de los diversos actores que demandan sus servicios. Periódicamente se publican clasificaciones a nivel mundial sobre el desempeño de los puertos marítimos atendiendo a factores cuantitativos, dando menos importancia a otros criterios que los actores de la cadena logística portuaria valoran para su calificación. A este respecto, en el presente trabajo de investigación se presenta un modelo integral de evaluación con ocho criterios, siguiendo la metodología multicriterio con la técnica de Thomas Saaty, con una ponderación de dominancia entre los criterios asignada por expertos del sector mediante una encuesta en línea. Se aporta un ejemplo práctico con cinco puertos para demostrar que los mejores puertos combinan adecuadamente los diversos criterios para lograr la meta de prestar servicios de calidad, procurando que los buques y loS contenedores permanezcan el menor tiempo posible en sus instalacioneses-ES
dc.descriptionLa mondialisation a son soutien dans l’échange international de biens, où les ports maritimes développent un rôle clé, de sorte que la compétitivité des pays est déterminée par la capacité de ces noeuds du réseau mondial à répondre les exigences des différents acteurs qui exigent leurs services. Périodiquement, des classifications mondiales sont publiées sur la performance des ports maritimes en réponse à des facteurs quantitatifs, ce qui donne moins d’importance à d’autres critères que les acteurs de la valeur de la chaîne logistique portuaire pour leur qualification. À cet égard, le présent document de recherche présente un modèle d’évaluation intégrale avec huit critères, suivant la méthodologie multicritère avec la technique de Thomas Saaty, avec une pondération de dominance parmi les critères attribués par les experts du secteur grâce à une enquête en ligne. Un exemple concret est fourni avec cinq ports pour démontrer que les meilleurs ports combinent adéquatement les différents critères pour atteindre l’objectif de fournir des services de qualité, en veillant à ce que les navires et les conteneursrestent aussi courts que possible dans leurs installations.fr-CA
dc.descriptionA globalização tem o seu apoio no intercâmbio internacional de bens, onde os portos marítimos desenvolvem um papel fundamental, de modo que a competitividade dos países é determinada pela capacidade destes nós da rede global para atender as demandas dos vários atores que exigem seus serviços. Periodicamente são publicadas as classificações mundiais sobre o desempenho dos portos marítimos em resposta a fatores quantitativos, dando menos importância a outros critérios que os atores do valor da cadeia logística portuária para sua qualificação. Neste sentido, o presente trabalho de pesquisa apresenta um modelo de avaliação integral com oito critérios, seguindo a metodologia multicriteres com a técnica de Thomas Saaty, com uma ponderação de dominância entre os critérios atribuídos por especialistas do setor através de uma pesquisa on-line. Um exemplo prático é fornecido com cinco portos para demonstrar que os melhores portos combinam adequadamente os vários critérios para atingir o objetivo de prestar serviços de qualidade, assegurando que as embarcaçõese os recipientes permaneçam o mais curtos possível em suas instalações.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/criteriolibre/article/view/5822
dc.identifier10.18041/1900-0642/criteriolibre.2019v17n30.5822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10901/18282
dc.languagespa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Librees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/criteriolibre/article/view/5822/5403
dc.relation/*ref*/Haezendonck, E., Dooms, M., & Verbeke, A. (15 de mayo de 2014). A new governance perspective on port–hinterland relationships: The Port Hinterland Impact (PHI) matrix. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 16, 229–249. doi:10.1057/mel.2014.10
dc.relation/*ref*/Arduino, G., Aronietis, R., Croze, Y., Frouws, K., Ferrari, C., Guihéry, L., ... Vanelslander, T. (2013). How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation. Research in Transportation Economics, 42, 97-107. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Bergqvist , R., & Zandén, N. E. (2012). Green port dues — The case of hinterland transport. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 85-91. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Button, K., Chin, A., & Kramberger, T. (2015). Incorporating subjective elements into liners’seaport choice assessments. Transport Policy, 44, 125-133. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.07.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Cepolina, S., & Ghiara, H. (2013). New trends in port strategies. Emerging role for ICT infrastructures. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 195-205. doi:10.1016/j. rtbm.2013.07.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Chang , C. C., & Wang, C. M. (2012). Evaluating the effects of green port policy: Case study of Kaohsiung harbor in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D, 17, 185-189. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.11.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Chun, Y., Wua, J., & Goh, M. (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets. Transportation Research Part E, 46, 1030-1042. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2010.01.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Clark, X., Dollar, D., & Micco, A. (2004). Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade. Journal of Development Economics, 75, 417-450. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.005
dc.relation/*ref*/De Langen, P. W., & Sharypova, K. (2013). Intermodal connectivity as a port performance indicator. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 97-102. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.003
dc.relation/*ref*/De Martino, M., Errichiello, L., Marasco, A., & Morvillo, A. (2013). Logistics innovation in Seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 123-133. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Dong, Q., & Saaty, T. (septiembre de 2014). An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3), 362-374.
dc.relation/*ref*/Dooms , M., Van der Lugt, L., & De Langen, P. W. (2013). International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of Rotterdam Authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 148-157. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
dc.relation/*ref*/Dunford, M., & Yeung, G. (2009). Port-Industrial Complexes. Elsevier Ltd., 285-294. doi:10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00858-0
dc.relation/*ref*/Figueiredo, G., & Pierre, C. (2015). The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency. Transportation Research Part A 78, 124-133. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.034
dc.relation/*ref*/Funke, M., & Yu, H. (2011). The emergence and spatial distribution of Chinese seaport cities. China Economic Review, 22(2), 196-209. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2011.01.002
dc.relation/*ref*/González Laxe, F. (2008). Port Governance: Main Trends. Revista de Economía Mundial, 18, 355-368. doi: WOS:000257680600027
dc.relation/*ref*/González, M. N., Soler, F., & Camarero, A. (2013). Modelo de eficiencia de las terminales de contenedores del sistema portuario español. Revista Electrónica de Comunicaciones y Trabajos de ASEPUMA, 14, 49 - 67. Recuperado el 4 de marzo de 2017, de: file:///C:/Users/LuisFernando/Downloads/Dialnet-ModeloDeEficienciaDeLasTerminales-DeContenedoresDel-4742939.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Güner, S. (2015). Investigating infrastructure, superstructure, operating and financial efficiency in the management of Turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis. Transport Policy, 40, 36-48. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Hales, D., Siu Lee, J., & Tae C, Y. (2016). The Balanced Theory of Port Competitiveness. Transportation Journal, 55(2), 168-189.doi:10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0168
dc.relation/*ref*/Heaver, T. (2006). The evolution and challenges of port economics. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 11-41. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16002-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Hollen, R., Van den Bosch, A., & Frans, V. (2015). Strategic levers of port authorities for industrial ecosystem development. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17(1), 79-96. doi:10.1057/mel.2014.28
dc.relation/*ref*/Hu, H., Wang, J., Jin, F., & Ding, N. (2015). Evolution of regional transport dominance in China 1910–2012. Journal Geography Science, 25(6), 723-738. doi:10.1007/s11442-015- 1198-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Iannone, F. (2012). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A, 46, 1424-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.019
dc.relation/*ref*/Jitendra K., P., & Ajay, P. (2012). Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions for commercial seaports in India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62, 54-67. doi:10.1016/j. ocecoaman.2012.03.008
dc.relation/*ref*/Klink , H. A., & Van den Berg, G. C. (98). Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 1-9. doi: SO966-6923 (97)00035-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Lloyd’s List Intelligence (2017). Top 100 container port 2016. Linton Nightingale. Recuperado el 22 de marzo de 2017, de: https://www.lloydslist.com/ll/incoming/article506151.ece
dc.relation/*ref*/Marlow, P., & Paixao, A. (2003). Measuring lean ports performance. International Journal of Transport Management, 1, 189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtm.2003.12.002
dc.relation/*ref*/Matsushima, N., & Takauchi, K. (2014). Port privatization in an international oligopoly. Transportation Research Part B, 67, 382-397. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.010
dc.relation/*ref*/Meidutė, I., Aranskisa, A., & Litvinenko, M. (2014). Consumer satisfaction with the quality of logistics services. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 330-340. doi: 10.1007/ s11442-015-1198-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Moreno Jiménez, J. M. (2002). El proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP). Fundamentos, metodología y aplicaciones. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza. Recuperado el 3 de marzo de 2017, de: http://users.dcc.uchile.cl/~nbaloian/DSS-DCC/ExplicacionMetodoAHP(ve%20 rpaginas11-16).pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Musso, E., Ferrari, C., & Benacchio, M. (2006). Port Investment: Profitability, Economic, Impacti and Financing. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 171-218. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16008-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Nightingale, L. (2016). Top 100 Container Ports 2016. Tampa: Lloyd’s List and Containerisation International.
dc.relation/*ref*/Notteboom, T. (2007). Strategic Challenges to Container Ports in a Changing Market Environment. Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 29-52. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17002-X
dc.relation/*ref*/Ozbas, B., Or, I., & Altiok, T. (2013). Comprehensive scenario analysis for mitigation of risks of the maritime traffic in the Strait of Istanbul. Journal Of Risk Research, 16(5), 541-561. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.726239
dc.relation/*ref*/Pallis, A. A., & De Langen, P. W. (2010). Seaports and the structural implications of the economic crisis. Research in Transportation Economics, 27, 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Panigrahi, J., & Pradhan, A. (2012). Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions for commercial seaports in India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62, 54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.03.008
dc.relation/*ref*/Park, J. y., & Yeo, G. t. (2012). An Evaluation of Greenness of major Korean ports: A Fuzzy Set Approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(1), 067-082. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2012.04.004
dc.relation/*ref*/Park, Y., & Medda, F. (2015). Hub Status and Indexation of Container Ports. The Asian Journal of Shiping and Logistics, 31(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2015.06.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Parola, F., & Maugeri, S. (2013). Origin and taxonomy of conflicts in seaports: Towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 114-122. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Ping Song , D., Lyons, A., Li, D., & Sharifi, H. (2016). Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transportation Research Part E, 87, 75-96. doi: 10.1016/j. tre.2016.01.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Pinto, M., Goldberg, D., Stupello, Bruno, B., & Haley, C. (2010). Regulation and price setting of pilotage services in Brazil. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 12(4), 430-442. doi: 10.1057/mel.2010.15
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodriguez, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal rail systems: Two of a kind? Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Saaty , T. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ IJSSci.2008.01759
dc.relation/*ref*/Saaty, T. (5 de septiembre de 1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. doi: 10.1016/0377- 2217(90)90057-I
dc.relation/*ref*/Saaty, T. (2000). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. En: M. Köksala, & S. Ziont, Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) (pp. 15-37). Ankara. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_2
dc.relation/*ref*/Saaty, T. (December 2008). Who won the 2008 olympics? A multicriteria decision of measuring intangibles. Journal of systems science and systems engeering, 17(4), 473-486.
dc.relation/*ref*/Saaty, T., Peniwati, K., & Shang, J. (octubre de 2007). The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Mathematical and Computer Modeliling, 46(7-8), 1041-1053.
dc.relation/*ref*/Shi, X., Tao, D., & Voss, S. (2011). RFID Technology And Its Application To Port-Based Container Logistics. Journal Of Organizational Computing And Electronic Commmerce, 21(4), 322-347. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2011.614202
dc.relation/*ref*/Shinohara, M. (2016). Characteristics of Japanese port policy: Strategic ports and policy dilemma. Research in Transportation Business & Management, xx-xx. doi: 10.1016/j. rtbm.2016.08.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Song, L., & Van Geenhuizen, M. (2014). Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces. Transport Policy, 36, 173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Soon, C., & Haur Lam, W. (2013). The growth of seaports in Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia for 2007-2011. Ocean & Coastal Management, 78, 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Talley , W. K., Ng , M., & Marsillac, E. (2014). Port service chains and port performance evaluation. Transportation Research Part E, 69, 236-247. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.008
dc.relation/*ref*/Talley, W. K. (2006). An Economic Theory Of The Port. Transportation Economics, 16, 43-65. doi:0.1016/S0739-8859(06)16003-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Talley, W. K. (2006). Port Performance: An Economics Perspective. Transportation Economics, 17, 499-516. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859 (06)17022-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Theys, C., Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., & De Langen, P. (2010). The economics behind the awarding of terminals in seaports: Towards a research agenda. Research in Transportation Economics, 37, 37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Tien Fang, F. (2016). 50 years of transportation in Singapore : achievements and challenges. Singapur: Fwa Tien Fang, National University of Singapure. doi: 79.110.19.199
dc.relation/*ref*/Tongzon, J. (1995). Determinants Of Port Performance And Efficiency. Transportation Researchs A. Police and Practice, 29 A(3), 245-252.
dc.relation/*ref*/Tovar, B., & Rodríguez, H. (2015). Classifying Ports for Efficiency Benchmarking: A Review and a Frontier-based Clustering Approach. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 35(3), 378-400. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1016473
dc.relation/*ref*/Ucan, E., & Nas, S. (2016). Analysing Istanbul Strait Maritime Pilot Capacity by Simulation Technique. Journal Of Navigation, 69(4), 815-827. doi:10.1017/S0373463315000909
dc.relation/*ref*/UNCTAD (2016). REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2016. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD/RMT/2016, UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION.
dc.relation/*ref*/Van der Lugt, L., Dooms, Michaël, M., & Parola, F. (2013). Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8,103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Veldman, S., Garcia-Alonso, L., & Liu, M. (2015). Testing port choice models using physical and monetary data: a comparative case study for the Spanish container trades. 43, 495-508. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1099754
dc.relation/*ref*/Wan, S., Min Lu, W., & Pao Wang, T. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 706-713. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Wang, C., Ducruet, C., & Wang, W. (2015). Evolution, accessibility and dynamics of road networks in China from 1600 BC to 1900 AD. Jorunal Geographic Science, 25(4), 451-484. doi: 10.1007/s11442-015-1180-0
dc.relation/*ref*/Wanga, Y., & Cullinane, K. (2014). Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 61, 152-163. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Wilmsmeier, G., Hoffmann, J., & Sanchez, R. (2006). The Impact of Port Characteristics on International Maritime Transport Costs. Port Economics Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 117-140. doi: 10.1016/S0739- 8859(06)16006-0
dc.relation/*ref*/Yun Peng, W., Zijian Guo, X. S., & Qi , Z. (2016). A stochastic seaport network retrofit management problem considering shipping routing design. Ocean & Coastal Management, 119, 169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.10.013
dc.relation/*ref*/Zhang, M., & Pel, A. J. (2016). Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.007
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevistas - Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contablesspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.sourceCriterio Libre; Vol. 17 Núm. 30 (2019): Revista Criterio Libre; 257-277es-ES
dc.source2323-0886
dc.source1900-0642
dc.subject.proposalcalidades-ES
dc.subject.proposalconectividades-ES
dc.subject.proposalcriterioses-ES
dc.subject.proposallogísticaes-ES
dc.subject.proposalpuertoses-ES
dc.subject.proposaltiempoes-ES
dc.titleA methodological proposal for the integral management of maritime portsen-US
dc.titleUna propuesta metodológica para la gestión integral de los puertos marítimoses-ES
dc.titleUne proposition méthodologique pour la gestion intégrale des ports maritimesfr-CA
dc.titleUma proposta metodológica para a gestão integral dos portos marítimospt-BR
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.localArtículo Revisado por Pares Académicoses-ES

Archivos

Colecciones

Criterio Libre