Stretching the scope of reflective law: Labour and the regulation of corporate conduct in the world society

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorTHOENE, ULF
dc.date2018-11-02
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T17:44:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-17T17:44:29Z
dc.descriptionCurrent globalization poses serious challenges facing the regulation of conduct of multinational corporations. Specifically, the labor law is being attacked by the forces of neoliberal economic policy, inadequate transnational law and the limited capacity of the nation state to enforce the law, especially in developing countries. This paper enriches the debate about the social and business regulation from the perspective of sociological systems theory. Based on the analysis of Luhmann communications rather than the actions or interactions, the paradigm of reflexive law reconciles social and economic regulatory objectives, contributing to more effective modes of regulatory governance and participatory. However, beyond the industrialized economies, the realities of industrial relations conflict and deep inequality have so far limited the adoption of reflective analytical law, presenting opportunities for additional theoretical and methodological reflections.en-US
dc.descriptionLa actual globalización representa serios retos frente a la regulación de la conducta de corporaciones multinacionales. Específicamente, laley laboral está siendo atacada por las fuerzas de la política económica neoliberal, la inadecuada legislación transnacional y la limitadacapacidad del Estado-Nación para hacer cumplir la ley, en particular en los países en desarrollo. Este documento enriquece el debatealrededor de la regulación social y empresarial desde una perspectiva de la teoría sociológica de sistemas. Basándose en el análisis de comunicaciones de Luhmann en lugar de las acciones o interacciones, el paradigma de la ley reflexiva reconcilia los objetivos regulatorios sociales y económicos, contribuyendo a modos de gobernanza regulatorios más efectivos y participativos. No obstante, más allá de las economías industrializadas, las realidades de las relaciones industriales conflictivas y la profunda inequidad hasta ahora han limitado la adopción analítica de la ley reflexiva, presentando oportunidades para reflexiones teóricas y metodológicas adicionales.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/advocatus/article/view/5955
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/18155
dc.languagespa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Librees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/advocatus/article/view/5955/5493
dc.relation/*ref*/ARTHURS, Harry. “Corporate Codes of Conduct: Profit, Power and Law in the Global Economy”. En: CRAGG, Wesley (Ed.). Ethics Codes, Corporations and the Challenge of Globalization, pp. 51-71. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, 2005. BALDWIN, Robert, CAVE, Martin. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. BARNARD, Catherine, DEAKIN, Simon, HOBBS, Richard. Reflexive Law, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Evolution of Labour Standards: The Case of Working Time. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper 294, 2004. BECK, Ulrich. Schöne neue Arbeitswelt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. BLACKETT, Adelle. “Global Governance, Legal Pluralism and the Decentered State: A Labor Law Critique of Codes of Corporate Conduct”. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8: 404-440, 2001. BRAITHWAITE, John. “Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies”. World Development, 34(5): 884-898, 2006. CALLIESS, Gralf-Peter, RENNER, Moritz. “Between Law and Social Norms: The Evolution of Global Governance”. Ratio Juris, 22(2): 260-280, 2009. COHEN, Jean L. “Personal Autonomy and the Law: Sexual Harassment and the Dilemma of Regulating ‘Intimacy’”. Constellations, 6(4): 443-472, 2002. COLLIER, Paul. Europe’s Submerging Economies. Global Policy, 10 de mayo de 2013. Recuperado 14 de mayo de 2013. En: http://www. globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/10/05/2013/ europe%E2%80%99s-submerging-economies DALLMANN, Hans-Ulrich. “Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory as a Challenge for Ethics”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1: 85-102, 1998. DEAKIN, Simon, SARKAR, Prabirjit. “Assessing the Long-Run Economic Impact of Labour Law Systems: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Analysis of New Time Series Data’, Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy (CLPE), Research Paper, 30/2008, 4(6), 2008. DILLER, Janelle. “Social Conduct in Transnational Enterprise Operations: The Role of the International Labour Organization”. En: BLANPAIN, Roger (Ed.). Multinational Enterprises and the Social Challenges of the XXIst Century. London: Kluwer, 2000. pp. 17-28. DILLER, Janelle. “A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives’. International Labour Review, 138(2): 99-129, 1999. FLORES ELIZONDO, Cecilia J. “Reflexive International Economic Law: Balancing Economic and Social Goals in the Construction of Law”. En: PERRY-KESSARIS, Amanda (Ed.). Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law: Text, Context, Subtext. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. pp. 118-132. GIDDENS, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990. HASSE, Raimund, KRÜCKEN, Georg. “Der Stellenwert von Organisationen in Theorien der Weltgesellschaft: Eine kritische Weiterentwicklung systemtheoretischer und neo-institutionalistischer Forschungsperspektiven”. En: HEINTZ, Bettina; MÜNCH, Richard; TYRELL, Hartmann (Eds.). Weltgesellschaft: Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Problemlagen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie (Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Lucius und Lucius, 2005. pp. 186-204. HESS, David. “Social Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness”. Journal of Corporation Law, 25(1): 41-84, 1999. HORNEMANN-MØLLER, Ivar. Understanding Integration and Differentiation: Inclusion, Marginalisation and Exclusion. Eurozine, 11 de junio de 2002. Recuperado 19 de julio de 2014. En: http://www.eurozine.com/ articles/2002-06-21-moller-en.html HORNUNG, Bernd R. “The Theoretical Context and Foundations of Luhmann’s Legal and Political Sociology”. En: KING, Michael; THORNHILL, Chris (Eds.). Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications. Oxford: Hart, 2006. pp. 187-216. ILO. Global Employment Trends 2014. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2014. ILO. International Labour Conference, 102nd Session, 2013, Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations. 2013. Recuperado 11 de julio de 2014. En: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/ groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/ meetingdocument/wcms_205472.pdf ILO. Multinational Enterprises (EMP/MULTI). 2008. Recuperado 17 de enero de 2009. En: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/ multi/download/wp1mcc.pdf ILO. “‘Reducing the Decent Work Deficit: A Global Challenge’, Report of the Director General to the International Labour Conference, 89th Session”. Junio de 2001. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2001. ILO. Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1977. JENKINS, Rhys, PEARSON, Ruth, SEYFANG, Gill. “Introduction”. En: JENKINS, Rhys, PEARSON, Ruth, SEYFANG, Gill (Eds.). Corporate Responsibility & Labour Rights. London: Earthscan, 2002. pp. 1-10. JESSOP, Bob. “The Future of the State in an Era of Globalization”. International Politics and Society, 03/2003. LUHMANN, Niklas. Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. LUHMANN, Niklas. “Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?”. International Review of Sociology, 7(1): 67-80, 1997. LUHMANN, Niklas. “The World Society as a Social System”. International Journal of General Systems, 8(3): 131-138, 1982.
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevistas - Ciencias Sociales y Humanasspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.sourceAdvocatus; No 23 (2014): ADVOCATUS; 235-256en-US
dc.sourceAdvocatus; Núm. 23 (2014): Advocatus; 235-256es-ES
dc.sourceAdvocatus; No 23 (2014): Advocatus; 235-256fr-CA
dc.sourceAdvocatus; n. 23 (2014): Advocatus; 235-256pt-BR
dc.source2390-0202
dc.source0124-0102
dc.subject.proposalLey reflexivaes-ES
dc.subject.proposalAutorregulación corporativaes-ES
dc.subject.proposalSociedad mundiales-ES
dc.subject.proposalLuhmannes-ES
dc.subject.proposalRelaciones industrialeses-ES
dc.titleStretching the scope of reflective law: Labour and the regulation of corporate conduct in the world societyen-US
dc.titleExtendiendo el alcance de la ley reflexiva Trabajo y la regulación de la conducta corporativa en la sociedad mundiales-ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Colecciones

Advocatus