Reading beyond lines through metacognitive strategies.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorPérez Pedraza, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorCalderón Pérez, Gloria Marcela
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T17:19:09Z
dc.date.available2016-05-23T17:19:09Z
dc.date.created2015-11-06
dc.description.abstractEste estudio informó sobre una investigación cualitativa que se centró en la lectura proceso de comprensión a través de estrategias metacognitivas, este proceso se ve favorecida. Se llevó a cabo con 34 estudiantes de cuarto ciclo en Manuel del Socorro Rodríguez de la escuela, en Bogotá. Los dos principales objetivos de este estudio fueron describir el desempeño de comprensión de lectura mediante el uso de estrategias metacognitivas en los estudiantes y para examinar los cambios en su rendimiento.spa
dc.description.abstractThis study reported on a qualitative research that focused on the reading comprehension process through metacognitive strategies, this process is fostered. It was carried out with 34 students of fourth cycle at Manuel Del Socorro Rodriguez School, in Bogota. The two main aims of this study were to describe the reading comprehension performance through using metacognitive strategies in the students and to examine changes in their performance.Eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/8295
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.referencesAbbs, B., Freebairn, I., & Barker, C., (2003). New Snapshot Pre-Intermediate. [Students’ Book]. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.eng
dc.relation.referencesAhmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013).The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10)eng
dc.relation.referencesAlderson, C. (2000). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesAlfassi, M. (1998).Reading for Meaning: The Efficacy of Reciprocal Teaching in Fostering Reading Comprehension in High School Students in Remedial Reading Classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309-332eng
dc.relation.referencesAL-Sohbani,Y.A.Y (2013). MetacognitiveReadingStrategiesUse byYemeniEFLUndergraduate UniversityStudents. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, Vol. 4,121-133eng
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, N. (2002). The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (Retrieved August 16,2007 from: www.cal.org/resources/digest/ 0110anderson. Html)eng
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, N. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. Lessons from Good Language Learners. Ed. Carol Griffiths. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 99- 109. Cambridge Books Online. Web. 30 June 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667.010eng
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert, F., and Kluwe, R. (eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 65–116eng
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2010). Doing action research for English language teachers. A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledgeeng
dc.relation.referencesCamelo, M. (2010). El mejoramiento cualitativo de la escritura a partir de la metacognición. ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournal,12, 69.eng
dc.relation.referencesCarrell, P, and Devine J.(2000). The reading process. In interactive approaches to second language reading (11- 21). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.eng
dc.relation.referencesCastillo, R. (2014). Teaching and learning another language strategically. Bogotá Universidad Distrital, Doctorado Interinstitucional en educaciónSpa
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A.U. & EI-Dniary, P.B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-341.eng
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A.U. (2005). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. In P.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow (Eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (pp. 87-101). White Plains, NY: Longman.eng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, A.D (2011). L2 learner strategies (Ch. 41). In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. II - Part V. Methods and instruction in second language teaching (pp. 681-698). Abingdon, England: Routledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sageeng
dc.relation.referencesDriscoll, M. (1994).psychology of learning for instruction.Boston: Allyn and Baconeng
dc.relation.referencesElliot J. (2000). La investigación acción en Educación. Madrid, ed. Morata SL.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911eng
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition.In F. Weinert& R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp.21 - 29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.eng
dc.relation.referencesFogarty, R. (1994). How to teach for metacognition. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishingeng
dc.relation.referencesGagné, E (1985) The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, U.S.A.: Little Brown and company.eng
dc.relation.referencesGarner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517-529eng
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, K. S. 1969. Analysis of oral reading miscues: applied psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly 5: 9-30eng
dc.relation.referencesGoode, T., Sockalingam, S., Bronheim, S., Brown, M., and Jones, W. (2000). A planner's guide: Infusing principles, content and themes related to cultural and linguistic competence into meetings and conferences. Washington, DC: National Center for Cultural Competence. Retrieved October 9, 2006,from http://www11.georgetown.edu/research/gucchd/nccc/resources/publicationstitle.htmleng
dc.relation.referencesGrabe, W.(2009). Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesKeene, E. and Zimmerman, S.(1997). Mosaic of thought: teaching comprehension in a reader’s workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.eng
dc.relation.referencesHalpern, D. F.(1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.eng
dc.relation.referencesHaller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of metacognitive studies. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 5-8eng
dc.relation.referencesHedge, T. (2003). Teaching & learning in the language classroom. UK: OUPeng
dc.relation.referencesJacobs, J. E., and Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educ. Psychol. 22: 255–278eng
dc.relation.referencesKarbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Íkala, 16,5-14.eng
dc.relation.referencesKemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1992) The Action Research Planner (third edition) Geelong, Vic.:Deakin University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesKlingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth- grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3-22eng
dc.relation.referencesKuhn, D. (2000). Metacognition development. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 178- 181eng
dc.relation.referencesLivingston, J. (1997). Metacognition: An Overvieweng
dc.relation.referencesLópez , Á. & Giraldo, M. C. (2011). The English reading strategies of two Colombian English preservice teachers. Ikala, 16,45-76.eng
dc.relation.referencesMager, R. F. (1984). Preparing instructional objectives (2nd Ed). Belmont, CA: Fearon- Pitmaneng
dc.relation.referencesMason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 96(2), 283–296.eng
dc.relation.referencesMateos, M (2001). Metacognición y Educación. Colección dirigida por Mario Carretero. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial AIQUE, 1 - edición.Spa
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Basseng
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional (1994). Ley general de Educación. Bogota.Spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension : Maximizing Your Impact. Chicago, IL, USA: ALA Editions. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.comeng
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesOlson, G. J., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R. L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real time comprehension processes. In D.E. Kieras & M.A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 253-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaumeng
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M.Q (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publicationseng
dc.relation.referencesPaz, P., H. (2011). How can metacognition be developed through problem-solving in higher education?. Ingeniería e Investigación, 31(1), 213-223. Retrieved October 05, 2015, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120- 56092011000100022&lng=en&tlng=eneng
dc.relation.referencesPressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., and Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In Vasta, R., and Whitehurst, G. (eds.), Annuals of Child Development (Vol. 5), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 89–129eng
dc.relation.referencesRAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: toward a RerD program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Author.eng
dc.relation.referencesRasinski, T., & Padak, N. (2000). Effective reading strategies: Teaching children who find reading difficult (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrilleng
dc.relation.referencesReynolds, R. E. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 4: 345–391.eng
dc.relation.referencesRonzano, S. J. (2010). Effectiveness of metacognitive strategies for improving reading comprehension in secondary students (Dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, No. 3427445.eng
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125eng
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.eng
dc.relation.referencesSchraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.eng
dc.relation.referencesSeliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (1995). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesSoars, L. and Soars, J. (1996). Headway elementary. Oxford University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, B. (2000). A Multidimensional Approach. Article retrieved November 2nd, 2007,from http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.p/alt/put/tlt/00/jul/tomlinson.htmleng
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Principled Frameworks for Materials Development. In Tomlinson, Brian (Ed). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Cromwell Press, London.eng
dc.relation.referencesTovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publisherseng
dc.relation.referencesWolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: HarperCollins.eng
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1).eng
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, S, and Hutchins C. (2003). Seven keys to comprehension: How to help your kids to read and get it. New York. Three Rivers Press.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subjectLecturaspa
dc.subjectMetacogniciónspa
dc.subjectEducaciónspa
dc.subject.lembTESIS - FACULTAD CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMAESTRÍA EN DIDÁCTICA DE LENGUAS EXTRANJERASspa
dc.subject.lembEDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembLECTURA - ENSEÑANZAspa
dc.subject.lembENSEÑANZA - MÉTODOSspa
dc.subject.proposalMetacogniciónspa
dc.subject.proposalComprensión de lecturaspa
dc.subject.proposalEstrategias metacognitivasspa
dc.subject.subjectenglishMetacognitioneng
dc.subject.subjectenglishReading comprehensioneng
dc.subject.subjectenglishMetacognitive strategieseng
dc.titleReading beyond lines through metacognitive strategies.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
tesis final.pdf
Tamaño:
2.29 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
CalderónPérezGloriaMarcela2015
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Maestría en Educación con énfasis en Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras