With the brain in mind: a collaborative proposal to enhance reading teaching practices.

dc.contributor.advisorNuñez Camacho, Vladimir Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Thian, Martha Patricia
dc.contributor.authorPérez Díaz, Patricia
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T14:01:14Z
dc.date.available2016-05-23T14:01:14Z
dc.date.created2016-04-13
dc.description.abstractEste estudio informa de un proceso Conjunto de Acciones de Investigación para desarrollar una propuesta de colaboración con el fin de mejorar las prácticas de enseñanza de lectura. El estudio se llevó a cabo con un grupo de cuatro profesores de inglés Manuelita Sáenz, una escuela pública ubicada en el sur de Bogotá. Los datos fueron recogidos a través de estos instrumentos realizados en diferentes momentos: cuatro encuestas, cuatro observaciones y entrevistas a los dos profesores de inglés. Los resultados revelaron que el trabajo de enseñanza colaborativa es una excelente oportunidad para mejorar las prácticas de enseñanza, ya que permite a los profesores para analizar, reflexionar y proponer estrategias para hacer frente a los problemas comunes que surgen en la práctica pedagógica diaria. Sin lugar a dudas, el trabajo colaborativo dio a los participantes la posibilidad de crecer profesionalmente ya que el proceso les permitió reconocer y valorar el uno al otro como sujeto de conocimiento. Por otro lado, los datos demostraron que es posible diseñar una propuesta de colaboración teniendo en cuenta la experiencia y el conocimiento de los participantes, así como las contribuciones de las nuevas tendencias pedagógicas como Brain / Mind Educación para mejorar las prácticas de enseñanza de lectura.spa
dc.description.abstractThis study reports a Collaborative Action Research process to develop a collaborative proposal in order to enhance reading teaching practices. The study was carried out with a group of four English teachers at Manuelita Saenz, a public school located in the south of Bogota. Data were gathered through these instruments conducted in different moments: four surveys, four observations and two interviews to the English teachers. Findings revealed that collaborative teaching work is an excellent opportunity to enhance teaching practices because it allows teachers to analyze, reflect and propose strategies in order to face common problems that arise in the daily pedagogical practice. Undoubtedly, collaborative work gave the participants the possibility to grow professionally since the process permitted them to recognize and value each other as a subject of knowledge. On the other hand, data showed that it is possible to design a collaborative proposal considering the experience and knowledge of the participants as well as contributions of new pedagogical tendencies like Brain /Mind Education to enhance reading teaching practices.Eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/8279
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.referencesAfflerbach, P. (2011). Understanding and Using Reading Assessment, K–12 (2nd Edition). Newark, DE, USA: International Reading Association. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.comeng
dc.relation.referencesAlireza, N. &Seyed, M. (2013, February 03). Brain-basedaspects of cognitive learning approaches in second language learning Canadian Center of Scienceand Education, 6(5), Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/26238eng
dc.relation.referencesAmado, B., y Borzone, A. (2011). La comprensión de textos expositivos: relevancia del conocimiento previo en niños de distintos entornos socioculturales. Interdisciplinaria: Revista de psicología y ciencias afines, 28(2), 261-277.Spa
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, D. 1977. Team teaching and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research 47 (1): 65-86eng
dc.relation.referencesBailey, J. Bruer, F. Symonds & J. Litchman (Eds.), Critical Thinking About Critical Periods (pp. 151-172). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing COeng
dc.relation.referencesBarnett, M. (1989). “Teaching Reading Strategies: How Methodology Affects Course Articulation.” Foreign Language Annals, 21, 109-21.eng
dc.relation.referencesBloome, D. (1985). Language Arts. Vol 62 Nº 2 Interaction in the Classroom. National Council of Teachers of English. pp 134-143eng
dc.relation.referencesBloomfield, L. (1984). Language (10th ed.). University of Chicago Presseng
dc.relation.referencesBryant, P. (1995). Collaborative action research "on the cutting edge" ELT Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10133/849/Bryant_Paul.pdf?sequence=1eng
dc.relation.referencesBurns, A. (2001). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers (1st ed.). Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesButt, R. L., Townsend, D., & Raymond, D. (1990). Bringing Reform to Life: Teachers' Stories and Professional Development. Cambridge Journal of Education. 20 (3), 255-268.eng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L. Manion, L & Morrison, K. Research Methods in Education fifth edition (p.462) London. Rouledge Falmereng
dc.relation.referencesCzico, C., Greenleaf, C. &Hurwitz, L. (2000). What is reading? an excerpt from reading for understanding. The Quarterly, 33(3), Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/787eng
dc.relation.referencesCaine, R., & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. United States: Adison Wesleyeng
dc.relation.referencesCaine, R., Caine, G., McClintic, C., & Klimek, K. (2009). 12 brain/mind principles in action. United States: Corvin Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesCarroll, T. (2009)“The next generation of learning teams. (p.13) PhiDelta Kappan 91 n.2 octobereng
dc.relation.referencesChomsky, N. (1965). Formal and substantive universals. In Aspects of the theory of syntax (p. 29). M.I.T Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesCraig, R., Naum, S., Royce, J. (2010) Research in Higher Education Journal Social emotional development, Page 1 Social emotional development: a new model of student learning in higher education. University of the Pacificeng
dc.relation.referencesCromley, J. G. (2005). Resources on metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction, and reading in adult literacy. Review of Adult Learning and Literacyeng
dc.relation.referencesDufour, R., Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (2002). Getting Started: Reculturing Schools to Become Professional Learning Communities. Bloomnigton: Solution Tree Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesDufour, R., Dufour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work (Second ed.). Solution Tree Presseng
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, G. (2004). Teacher-centered Professional Development. Alexandia, Virginia, USA.eng
dc.relation.referencesDouglas, B. (2001) Teaching by Principles ~An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Edition) Publisher: Longmaneng
dc.relation.referencesDuke, N., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading. In A. Farstrub & S. Samuels (Eds.), What Research has to say about Reading (3 ed.). United States: Library of the Congress.eng
dc.relation.referencesDuman, B. (2010). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE, 10(4), 2077-2103. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919873.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesEcheverri, L., & McNulty, M. (2010). Reading Strategies to Develop Higher Thinking Skills for Reading Comprehension. Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1657-07902010000100008eng
dc.relation.referencesErbest, S., Folkerts, M., Gergis, M., Pederson, S. &Stivers, H. (2007). Understanding how cognitive psychology can inform and improve spanish vocabulary acquisition in high school classrooms. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 121-132.eng
dc.relation.referencesEspinosa, Mariella. (2010) El uso de la estrategia de la estrategia de lectura LIDE en la comprensión de textos y en la motivación a la lectura. Revista Lectura y Vida p. 54-61Spa
dc.relation.referencesFernández, M., Linares, M., y Mariscal, P. (2012). El papel de la familia en el desarrollo de la comprensión lectora en el cambio de Educación Primaria a Secundaria. Electronic Journal Of research In Educational Psychology, 10(1), 129-150eng
dc.relation.referencesGalini, R., & Efthymia, P. (2010). A Collaborative Action Research Project in the Kindergarten: Perspectives and Challenges for Teacher Development through Internal Evaluation Processes. New Horizons in Education, 58,(2). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ966648.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesGriffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87–99eng
dc.relation.referencesGoodman, K. S. The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.), The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press, 1968eng
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero , A. (2003). Visualization and reading comprehension. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Texaseng
dc.relation.referencesHabermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics (Jeremy J Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon presseng
dc.relation.referencesHargreaves, A. (1995): Changing teachers, changing times. Teachers’ work and culture in the Postmodern Age. London: Cassell.eng
dc.relation.referencesHarding-Stricker, T. (2008). Graphic organizers to support active reading strategy instruction. Retrieved from http://www.bigthought.org/Portals/BT/2011TM_SummerCurriculum/1st/excellent-bookof-graphic-organizers.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagemen (2nd ed.). Portland, ME: Stenhouse .eng
dc.relation.referencesHymes, D. (1971). "Competence and performance in linguistic theory" Acquisition of languages: Models and methods. Ed. Huxley and E. Ingram. New York: Academic Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesJacobs, G., Power, M., Michael P., Loh, W. (2002) The Teacher's Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning: Practical Techniques, Basic Principles. Corvin Presseng
dc.relation.referencesJensen, E. (1996) “Brain-Compatible Learning” International Alliance for Learning, Summer 1996, Vol. 3 #2. IAL, Encinitas, CAeng
dc.relation.referencesJensen. Eric (2008) Brain-based learning ‘The new paradigm of teaching’. Corvin Press. United Stateseng
dc.relation.referencesKvale, S. (2006). Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480- 500. Retrieved from http://qix.sagepub.com/content/12/3/480.shoreng
dc.relation.referencesKramsch, C. (1994). Language, culture, and voice in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. NovELTy, 8(1), 4-21eng
dc.relation.referencesLadrón de Guvard, A., Suibiabre, J. (2011). Narrativa en Contexto: Propuesta Pedagógica para mejorar la Comprensión Lectora. Horizontes Educacionales, 16(1), 9-17Spa
dc.relation.referencesLassonde, C., & Israel, S. (2006). Teacher Collaboration for Professional Learning (First ed.). Jossey-Bass.eng
dc.relation.referencesLu, Lo Hsueh. (2007). Influencia de la motivación y el uso de estrategias en la comprensión lectora. Lectura y Vida 28(3), 32-39Spa
dc.relation.referencesMcGee, L.M., & Richgels, D.J. (1996). Literacy's beginnings: Supporting young readers and writers (Second Edition). Needham, MA: Allyn and Baconeng
dc.relation.referencesMeyer, A., & Rose, D. (1999). Learning to read in the computer age. United States: Brookline Books/Lumen Editionseng
dc.relation.referencesMercuri, S. (2010, Noviembre). Using graphic organizers as a tool for development of scientific language. GIST, 4(1), 30-47.eng
dc.relation.referencesMergel, B. (1998, May 1). Instructional Design & Learning Theory. Retrieved from http://etad.usask.ca/802papers/mergel/brenda.eng
dc.relation.referencesMills, G. (2007). Action research a guide for the teacher researcher. (3 ed.). New Yersey: Pearsoneng
dc.relation.referencesMontenegro, M. (2009). Factores de la metodología de enseñanza que inciden en el proceso de desarrollo de la comprensión lectora en niños. Zona Proxima, (11), 134-143.Spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreillon, J. (2007). Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact. Chicago, IL, USA: ALA Editions. Retrieved from http://www.ebrary.comNeville, H., & Bruer, J. (2001). Language processing: How experience affects brain organisation. In J.eng
dc.relation.referencesNeville, H.J., & Bruer, J.T. (2001) “Language Processing: How Experience Affects Brain Organisation”. In D.B. Bailey, J.Teng
dc.relation.referencesNunam, D. (1992). Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesNuttall, C. (1989). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. M. Geddes & G. Sturtridge (Eds.), Oxford: Heinemann International Publishing.eng
dc.relation.referencesNuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (5th ed.). Thailand: Macmillan Publishers Limitedeng
dc.relation.referencesPatton, M.Q. (1980) Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.(203– 5)eng
dc.relation.referencesPiggot, I. (2012). Action Research for Sustainable Development in a Turbulent World (1st ed.). Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt.eng
dc.relation.referencesPressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Fastrup & S. Sammuels (Eds.), What Research has to Say about Reading Instruction (pp. 291-309). Retrieved from http://www.reading.org/Publish.aspx?page=bk177-13- Pressley.pdf&mode=retrieve&D=10.1598/0872071774.13&F=bk177-13- Pressley.pdf&key=336C6BCD-DBFB-4C9E-8921-4AA481098D1Eeng
dc.relation.referencesRadin, J. (2009). Brain-Compatible Teaching and Learning: Implications for Teacher Education. Educational Horizons. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ868337.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesSagor, R. (2000). Guiding School Improvement with Action Research. (p.217)ASCD Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.eng
dc.relation.referencesSaleh, S. (2011). The Effectiveness of the Brain-Based Teaching Approach in Generating Students' Learning Motivation towards the Subject of Physics: A Qualitative Approach. (1), 10-10. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522234eng
dc.relation.referencesSaussure, F. (1985). Curso de Linguistica General (24th ed.). Editorial Losada Libreria Los LibrosSpa
dc.relation.referencesSavoie‐Zajc, L., & Descamps‐Bednarz, N. (2007). Action research and collaborative research: Their specific contributions to professional development. Educational Action Research, 15(4), 577-596eng
dc.relation.referencesSprenger, M. (2013). Wiring the brain for reading. Brain-based strategies for teaching literacy. . (1 ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.eng
dc.relation.referencesShen, M., & Huang, Y. (2007). Collaborative Action Research for Reading Strategy Instruction: A Case in Taiwan . Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 108–121-108– 121eng
dc.relation.referencesShohamy, E. (2007). Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge, London. (p. 5)eng
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 5. Retrieved from http://203.72.145.166/ELT/files/57-3-4.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesThurmond, V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 254– 256. 95. Tucker, Weng
dc.relation.referencesWallace, M. (2006). Action Research for Language Teachers (p. 273). Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesWells, Gordon. 1986. The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.eng
dc.relation.referencesWenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932eng
dc.relation.referencesWhitebread, D. (2000) The Psychology of Teaching and Learning in the Primary School, London: Routledge Falmer pag 20eng
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. England: Longmaneng
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (2008). Teaching the brain to read. Strategies for improving fluency, vocabulary and comprehension. United States: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD.eng
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (2008). How your child learns best. Brain friendly strategies you can use to ignite your child’s learning and increase school success. United States: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCDeng
dc.relation.referencesWolf, Patricia. (2010) Brain Matters: Translating Research into Classroom Practice 2 nd ed. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD)eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subjectLectura - Enseñanzaspa
dc.subjectEducaciónspa
dc.subjectPropuesta docentespa
dc.subject.lembTESIS - FACULTAD CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMAESTRÍA EN DIDÁCTICA DE LENGUAS EXTRANJERASspa
dc.subject.lembEDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembENSEÑANZA - MÉTODOSspa
dc.subject.lembLECTURA - ENSEÑANZAspa
dc.subject.lembENSEÑANZA PÚBLICAspa
dc.subject.proposalTrabajo colaborativospa
dc.subject.proposalDesarrollo profesionalspa
dc.subject.proposalPrácticas de enseñanza de lectura y cerebro / mente Educación (BME)spa
dc.subject.proposalBrain estrategias friendly.spa
dc.subject.subjectenglishCollaborative workeng
dc.subject.subjectenglishProfessional developmenteng
dc.subject.subjectenglishReading teaching practices and Brain/Mind Education (BME)eng
dc.subject.subjectenglishBrain Friendly strategieseng
dc.titleWith the brain in mind: a collaborative proposal to enhance reading teaching practices.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
TESIS FINAL ESCRITA.pdf
Tamaño:
963.57 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
CorreaThianMarthaPatricia2016
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Patricia P. Díaz y Martha P. Correa T..pdf
Tamaño:
714.46 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: