Fostering sixth graders metacognitive learning strategies through content and language integrated learning lessons

dc.contributor.advisorDávila Rubio, Alejandro Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorCorreal Villamil, Dora Elena
dc.contributor.authorMartin Coy, Julio Ernesto
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-22T23:31:23Z
dc.date.available2017-03-22T23:31:23Z
dc.date.created2016-09-13
dc.description.abstractEn el contexto educativo público, es una situación común para los maestros en secundaria iniciar el proceso de aprendizaje de inglés con los estudiantes que evidencian dificultades en todas las habilidades del lenguaje. Por lo tanto, se convierte en un desafío para los profesores de secundaria para hacer frente a esta situación mediante la búsqueda de opciones y estrategias que permiten superar esas dificultades y motivar a los estudiantes en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. En la pedagogía de hoy, la competencia de aprender a aprender ha adquirido mayor relevancia en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras, ya que pretende adquirir ciertas habilidades metacognitivas o capacidades que permitan a los estudiantes conocer y regular sus propios procesos de aprendizaje. Así, a través del desarrollo de esta competencia; Los alumnos pueden no sólo mejorar sus conocimientos lingüísticos, sino también participar en su proceso de forma más autónomaspa
dc.description.abstractMetacognition is an important aspect in the learning process that allows learners to recognize their strengths and weaknesses as well as organize their learning process for facing different learning challenges. The researchers faced the students` foreign language difficulties at the beginning of secondary level in a public school in Bogota; by fostering the use of metacognitive learning strategies along with the implementation of a set of lessons in the frame of Content and Language Integrated Learning and including the backward design as a class methodology. The researchers used the principles of Thematic Analysis to examine the different data gathered from several instruments such as students’ artifacts including a chart adapted from Chamot (1999), which was used for planning and evaluating students’ learnings, a task planner, a survey as well as researchers` field notes. The results revealed a progressive advance in the learners` use of metacognitive strategies, when relating new topics to previous knowledge and planning their learning goals. It was also evident that learners required more emphasis on the self-assessment process. This project also suggests a novel way to foster metacognition by articulating the Content and Language Integrated Learning to the backward design; the first which is a well-known approach, based on the use of subject content for language learning purposes whilst the target language is used for subject content learning; the second as an innovative planning framework in which teachers or designers are guided to establish and integrate precise learning objectives. Likewise, with the backward design the learners are challenged to use the new learnings in useful and meaningful contexts,Eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/9791
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, N. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Learning and Teaching. United States: Brigham Young University. Eric Digest.eng
dc.relation.referencesBaron, C. & Martinez, M. (2013). Metacognitive learning strategies, their influences on vocabulary learning through a webquest. Colombia: Universidad de la Sabana,eng
dc.relation.referencesBaron, C. & Martinez, M. (2013). Metacognitive learning strategies, their influences on vocabulary learning through a webquest. Colombia: Universidad de la Sabana,eng
dc.relation.referencesBentley, K. (2010). The TKT Course. CLIL Module. England: Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesBerry, M. (2014). Metacognition in CLIL. [Online] retrieved Oct. 2015 from http://clilmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CLIL-Magazine-Spring-2014.pdf. CLIL Magazine. CLIL media courses on line.com. (p.13 - 14) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). University of the West of Englandeng
dc.relation.referencesBrown, A. L., & Palliscar, A. S. (1982). Introducing strategies learning from tests by means of informed self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities.eng
dc.relation.referencesCarr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical. Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer.eng
dc.relation.referencesChamot, A., Barnhardt, S, El-Dinary, P. & Robbins, J. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. New York: Pearson Education. Longman.eng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, A. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies, clarifying the issues. Revised Version July 1996. Seville, Spaineng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.eng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2005). Research Methods in Education, (5th Ed.). London and New York: Taylor and Francis Group.eng
dc.relation.referencesCouncil of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference of languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesDale, L. & Tanner, R. CLIL Activities. A resource for subject and language teachers. England: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, I. (2015). Training in Metacognitive Strategies for Students´vocabulary improvement by Using Learnings journals. Montería, Colombia.eng
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Parliament and Council. (2007). Key competences for lifelong learning. European Reference Framework. Belgiumeng
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. (1979a). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hal Publishing.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. (1979b). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlavell, J. (1979b). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist.eng
dc.relation.referencesGlasow, P. (2005). Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology. Virginia: Mitre. McLean,eng
dc.relation.referencesJhonson, B. & Christenssen, L. (2010). Educational research. United States. Sage.eng
dc.relation.referencesKaur, K. (2014). Young learners’ metacognitive knowledge of listening comprehension and pedagogical recommendations for the teaching of listening. Singapore: National Institute of Education. . Mehisto, P., March, D. & Frigols, M. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. United Kingdom: MacMillaneng
dc.relation.referencesMerriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study application in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.eng
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (1994). Ley General de Educación 115. Bogotá, Colombia. Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (1998). Serie Lineamientos Curriculares. Idiomas extranjeros. Bogotá Colombia.eng
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Formar en lenguas extranjeras: inglés, el reto. Serie, Guías N°22. Bogotá, Colombia.eng
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (2013). Ley 1651 de 2013. Ley de Bilingüismo. Bogotá, Colombiaeng
dc.relation.referencesMoreno, A. (2006) Learning to learn. In Learning to learn network meeting report. Ispraeng
dc.relation.referencesO’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesO´Malley, M. (1995). Learning Strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesOxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle Publishers, 1990.eng
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in Language Teaching. (2nd Ed). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesWenden, A. & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International. 168eng
dc.relation.referencesWiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. (2nd Ed.) Vancouver: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD.eng
dc.relation.referencesWirth, K. and Perkins, D. (2008). Learning to learn. Found in English word information University of South Dakota. South Dakota. United States.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subjectEstrategias metacognitivasspa
dc.subjectLenguajespa
dc.subjectAprendizaje integradospa
dc.subjectEducaciónspa
dc.subject.lembTESISspa
dc.subject.lembTESIS-EDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembFACULTAD DE EDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMAESTRÍA EN EDUCACIÓN CON ÉNFASIS EN DIDÁCTICA DE LAS LENGUAS EXTRANJERASspa
dc.subject.lembCONCIENCIAspa
dc.subject.lembCONOCIMIENTOspa
dc.subject.lembAPRENDIZAJEspa
dc.subject.proposalEstrategias metacognitivasspa
dc.subject.proposalConocimiento previospa
dc.subject.proposalConcienciaspa
dc.subject.proposalContextos significativosspa
dc.subject.subjectenglishMetacognitive strategieseng
dc.subject.subjectenglishPrevious knowledgeeng
dc.subject.subjectenglishAwarenesseng
dc.subject.subjectenglishMeaningful contextseng
dc.titleFostering sixth graders metacognitive learning strategies through content and language integrated learning lessonsspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesis de Maestríaspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
FOSTERING METACOGNITION IN CLIL LESSONS.pdf
Tamaño:
4.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
MartinCoyJulioErnesto2016
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Julio E. Martin C. y Dora E. Correal V..pdf
Tamaño:
643.85 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: