Aplicativo para el Chequeo y Representación de Nudos Estructurales en Concreto Reforzado: Un Enfoque Educativo

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.advisorNaranjo Torres, Carlos Ariel
dc.contributor.authorArias Diaz, Miguel Angel
dc.contributor.authorAguirre Cardona, Alejandro
dc.coverage.spatialPereiraspa
dc.creator.emailmiguel-ariasd@unilibre.edu.cospa
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T14:18:19Z
dc.date.available2025-08-13T14:18:19Z
dc.date.created2025-07-02
dc.description.abstractEl desarrollo de un aplicativo especializado para el chequeo de nudos estructurales surge de la clara necesidad de superar las limitaciones de las herramientas existentes y abordar una brecha significativa en la enseñanza y práctica de la ingeniería civil. Se evidenció que los métodos manuales y las hojas de cálculo básicas son insuficientes para capturar la compleja interacción cíclica en uniones, lo que lleva a costosos sobre diseños o peligrosas subestimaciones, especialmente en nudos tipo 2 bajo cargas sísmicas severas. Además, se constató una escasez crítica de aplicativos, softwares o cartillas específicas para nudos en comparación con otros elementos estructurales, y los pocos existentes son generalmente inaccesibles para estudiantes debido a su alto costo (ej. ETABS, $7000 USD, aproximadamente). Incluso con convenios universitarios (como CYPE en la Universidad Libre), se identificaron errores en algunos chequeos automáticos, subrayando la necesidad de validación manual. Ante este panorama, el aplicativo se basa en el conocimiento previo del diseño de nudos y la norma NSR-10 para cerrar la brecha entre la teoría no lineal y su aplicación práctica. Su objetivo es automatizar los cálculos tediosos y propensos a errores, visualizar el estado de esfuerzo-deformación, calcular la resistencia al cortante y generar detalles de refuerzo, funcionando como una herramienta de aprendizaje activo que optimiza diseños y mejora la precisión en proyectos estructurales.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe development of a specialized application for checking structural nodes arises from the clear need to overcome the limitations of existing tools and address a significant gap in civil engineering education and practice. It became evident that manual methods and basic spreadsheets are insufficient to capture the complex cyclic interaction in joints, leading to costly overdesigns or dangerous underestimations, especially in type 2 joints under severe seismic loads. In addition, there is a critical shortage of specific applications, software, or handbooks for nodes compared to other structural elements, and the few that exist are generally inaccessible to students due to their high cost (e.g., ETABS, approximately $7,000 USD). Even with university agreements (such as CYPE at the Universidad Libre), errors were identified in some automatic checks, highlighting the need for manual validation. Given this situation, the application is based on prior knowledge of node design and the NSR-10 standard to bridge the gap between nonlinear theory and its practical application. Its objective is to automate tedious and error-prone calculations, visualize the stress-strain state, calculate shear resistance, and generate reinforcement details, functioning as an active learning tool that optimizes designs and improves accuracy in structural projects.spa
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad Libre Seccional Pereira -- Facultad de Ingeniería -- Ingeniería Civilspa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/31688
dc.relation.referencesAwad, R. R. (2012). Análisis y diseño sísmico de edificios. Universidad Eafit.spa
dc.relation.referencesBLANCO, M. (2012). Fundamental Criteria for the Seismic-Resistant Design. Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad Central de Venezuela, 27(3), 071–084.spa
dc.relation.referencesChoi, H. K., Choi, Y. C., & Choi, C. S. (2013). Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections. Engineering Structures, 56, 1820–1835.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl‑Amoury, T., & Ghobarah, A. J. E. S. (2002). Seismic rehabilitation of beam–column joint using GFRP sheets. Engineering Structures, 24(11), 1397–1407.spa
dc.relation.referencesElmorsy, M., Leinenbach, C., & Vassiliou, M. F. (2025). Small‑Scale Physical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Joints Using Additively Manufactured Reinforcement. Journal of Structural Engineering, 151(5), 04025036spa
dc.relation.referencesGe, Q., Ai, J., Mao, Y., Li, Y., Lu, Y., & Xiong, F. (2025). Study of seismic performance and resilience of a precast concrete beam‑column joint with a replaceable energy‑dissipation component. Journal of Building Engineering, 112167.spa
dc.relation.referencesIbarra, L. F., Medina, R. A., & Krawinkler, H. (2005). Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(12), 1489–1511.spa
dc.relation.referencesJalayer, F., & Cornell, C. A. (2009). Alternative non‐linear demand estimation methods for probability‐based seismic assessments. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(8), 951–972.spa
dc.relation.referencesLowes, L. N., & Altoontash, A. (2003). Modeling reinforced‑concrete beam‑column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(12), 1686–1697spa
dc.relation.referencesMangalathu, S., & Jeon, J. S. (2018). Classification of failure mode and prediction of shear strength for reinforced concrete beam‑column joints using machine learning techniques. Engineering Structures, 160, 85–94.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoehle, J. P. (2015). Seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings (Vol. 814). New York: McGraw‑Hill Education.spa
dc.relation.referencesNie, X., Huang, D., Zhuang, L., Fan, J., & Deng, N. (2025). Precast concrete connections for alleviating reinforcement congestion: A state‑of‑the‑art review. Engineering Structures, 331, 119985.spa
dc.relation.referencesParra‑Montesinos, G. J., Peterfreund, S. W., & Shih‑Ho, C. (2005). Highly damage‑tolerant beam‑column joints through use of high‑performance fiber‑reinforced cement composites. ACI Structural Journal, 102(3), 487.spa
dc.relation.referencesParastesh, H., Hajirasouliha, I., & Ramezani, R. (2014). A new ductile moment‑resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: An experimental investigation. Engineering Structures, 70, 144–157.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriestley, M. J. N., & Kowalsky, M. J. (2000). Direct displacement‑based seismic design of concrete buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(4), 421–444.spa
dc.relation.referencesQian, K., & Li, B. (2013). Performance of three‑dimensional reinforced concrete beam‑column substructures under loss of a corner column scenario. Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(4), 584–594.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaatcioglu, M., & Ozcebe, G. (1989). Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. Structural Journal, 86(1), 3–12.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpacone, E., & El‑Tawil, S. (2004). Nonlinear analysis of steel‑concrete composite structures: State of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), 159–168.spa
dc.relation.referencesVelasco, M. A. P., Dela Cruz, O. G., & Guades, E. J. (2023, January). Reinforced Concrete Beam–Column Joint: A Review of Its Cyclic Behavior. In Advances in Civil Engineering Materials: Selected Articles from the 6th International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (ICACE 2022), August 2022, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (pp. 63–79). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.spa
dc.relation.referencesXie, Y. M., & Steven, G. P. (1993). A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 49(5), 885–896.spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, S. S., Zhang, D. D., & Nie, X. F. (2025). Behavior of RC interior beam‑to‑column joints with FRP‑strengthened beam web openings under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 324, 119373.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/spa
dc.subjectAplicativospa
dc.subjectConcreto Reforzadospa
dc.subjectDuctilidadspa
dc.subjectNudo Estructuralspa
dc.subjectSismicospa
dc.subject.subjectenglishApplicationspa
dc.subject.subjectenglishReinforced concretespa
dc.subject.subjectenglishDuctilityspa
dc.subject.subjectenglishStructural nodespa
dc.subject.subjectenglishSeismicspa
dc.titleAplicativo para el Chequeo y Representación de Nudos Estructurales en Concreto Reforzado: Un Enfoque Educativospa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesis de Pregradospa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Miniatura
Nombre:
AUTORIZACIÓN PARA LA PUBLICACIÓN.pdf
Tamaño:
12.79 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar
Miniatura
Nombre:
Aplicativo para el Chequeo y Representación de Nudos Estructurales en Concreto Reforzado, Un Enfoque Educativo.pdf
Tamaño:
4.56 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Ingeniería civil