Peer Feedback: A strategy based on error treatment to enhance writing skills in EFL classroom

dc.contributor.advisorGuerrero, Carmen Helena
dc.contributor.authorFigueroa Vega, Neyla Edith
dc.contributor.authorGamboa Merchán, Adriana
dc.coverage.spatialBogotáspa
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T14:12:14Z
dc.date.available2016-05-23T14:12:14Z
dc.date.created2015-07
dc.description.abstractEsta tesis basada en la investigación-acción muestra el proceso y los resultados de un estudio aplicado en una escuela pública en Bogotá con grado octavo y noveno sobre la aplicación de la estrategia de retroalimentación entre pares para el tratamiento de errores. La metodología llevada a cabo en este estudio incluyó métodos teóricos empíricos, teóricos y meta teóricos. El análisis pone de manifiesto que los comentarios de pares se benefician las habilidades de escritura de los estudiantes, ya que es una forma diferente de afrontar su proceso de aprendizaje de idiomas a través de una estrategia de colaboración. Palabras clave: tratamiento de errores, de retroalimentación entre pares, habilidades de escritura, los procesos de aprendizaje de idiomas, enseñanza de ESL.spa
dc.description.abstractThis thesis based on Action Research shows the process and results from a study implemented at a public school in Bogotá with eighth and ninth graders about the implementation of the strategy peer feedback for the error treatment; the methodology carried out in this study included empirical, theoretical, and meta theoretical methods. The analysis evidenced that peer comments benefit student’s writing skills because it is a different way to face their language learning process through a collaborative strategy. Key words: Error treatment, Peer feedback, writing skills, language learning process, ESL teaching.Eng
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad Librespa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10901/8281
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.referencesAndton, M. & Di Camilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 314-342eng
dc.relation.referencesBazzani, S. (2010). Tratamiento del Error desde la Perspectiva Docente en ELE. Retrieved from http://funiber.comspa
dc.relation.referencesBlumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/hanneml/documents/notes/blumer.doceng
dc.relation.referencesBurt, M. & Kiparsky, C. (1978). Global and local errors. En S. &. Stenson, New Frontiers in Second Language. Newbury House Publishing.eng
dc.relation.referencesByrne. (1988). Teaching Writing Skills. Singapore: Longman.eng
dc.relation.referencesChaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revision. RELC Journal, 1-14.eng
dc.relation.referencesChin, G. (2010). An Investigation of Effectiveness of Peer Feedback. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3699369/An_Investigation_of_Effectiveness_of_Peer_Feedbackeng
dc.relation.referencesCohen, L. &. Manion, L.(1984). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesCorder, S. (1967). The Significance of Learners' Errors. IRAL, 161 - 170eng
dc.relation.referencesCorder, S. (1973). Introducing Applied Linguistics (PP. 274-277). . Harmondsworth: Penguin.eng
dc.relation.referencesCorder, S. (s.f.). Error Analysis and Interlanguage.eng
dc.relation.referencesElliott, J. (1980). Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesFarrah, M. (2012). The Impact of Peer Feedback on Improving the Writitng Skills among Hebron University Students. Retrieved from http://scholar.najah.edu/sites/default/files/journal-article/impact-peerfeedback-improving-writing-skills-among-hebron-university-students.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesFerris, D. (1995). Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple-draft Composition Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 33-53.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlower, L. &. Hayes, J.(1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 365-387.eng
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, P. (2004). Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon Avon: Multilingual Matters , 44-68.eng
dc.relation.referencesGiraldo, C. &. Perry, R. (2008). Treating ESL Writing Errors: Balancing Form and Content. How Journal Colombia, 107-123.eng
dc.relation.referencesHashimoto, M. (2004). An examination of ESL teachers' treatment of written errors,. Retrieved from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/theses/hashimoto/eng
dc.relation.referencesHyland, F. &. Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 185-212.eng
dc.relation.referencesHyland, K. &. Candlin, C. (1999). Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. New York: Taylor & Francis.eng
dc.relation.referencesJimena, E. et al. (2010). Error Correction: A Bridge to Grammatical Accuracy in L2 Writing. Retrieved from http://fportfolio.petra.ac.id/.../Full_Paper_Error_Correctioeng
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. (1987). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Prentice-Hall International.eng
dc.relation.referencesLe Compte, M. &.Schensul, J. (1999). Analyzing and Interpreting Ethnographic Data. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesLeal, A. & Sánchez, P. (2009). El Tratamiento del Error en Lengua Inglesa dentro del Aula de Idiomas.spa
dc.relation.referencesLondoño, D. (2008). Error Analysis in a Written Composition. PROFILE Journal.eng
dc.relation.referencesLyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37-66eng
dc.relation.referencesMc Leod, S.A. (2012). Zone of Proximal Development. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.htmleng
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (Octubre de 2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias: Inglés. Retrieved from http://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/micrositios/1752/articles315518_recurso_3.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesMinisterio de Educación Nacional. (s.f.). Ley 115 de Febrero 8 de 1994. Retrieved from http://www.oei.es/quipu/colombia/Ley_115_1994.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2001). English as a global language. TESOL Quarterly, 605-606.eng
dc.relation.referencesPea, R. (1993). Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education. Retrieved from http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/publicat/dil-papers-2/dc2/dc2.pdfeng
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. (1971). A Non- Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis. Journal of ELT, 204-219.eng
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. a. (1996). Reflective Teaching In Second Language. Oxford University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesSeow, (2002). A. En J. a. Richards, Methodology in Language Teaching An Anthology of Current Practice (págs. 315-320). New York: Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesRoy, P. (s.f.). En S. Gabriel, Distributed Cognitions (págs. 47 - 81). Cambridge.eng
dc.relation.referencesSeidel, J. (1998). Qualitative Data Analysis. Obtenido de http://www.qualisresearch.com/qda_paper.htmeng
dc.relation.referencesTram, B. (2010). Common Written Errors Commited By First Year Students at Hanoi University. Retrieved from http://es.scribd.com/doc/32025845/9/Interlingual-errorseng
dc.relation.referencesTribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford University Presseng
dc.relation.referencesVan, E. et al. (1984). Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages. London.eng
dc.relation.referencesVillamil, O. & De Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer Revisio in the L2 Classroom: Social Aspects of Social Behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 51-75.eng
dc.relation.referencesVygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesWallace, M. (1998). Action Research for English Teachers. Cambridge University Press.eng
dc.relation.referencesWood, D. et al. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology, 89-100.eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.5 Colombia*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/*
dc.subjectHabilidades en escrituraspa
dc.subjectInglésspa
dc.subjectLengua extranjeraspa
dc.subject.lembTESIS - FACULTAD CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMAESTRÍA EN EDUCACIÓN CON ÉNFASIS EN DIDÁCTICA DE LAS LENGUAS EXTRANJERASspa
dc.subject.lembINVESTIGACIÓNspa
dc.subject.lembMETODOLOGÍAspa
dc.subject.lembESCRITURAspa
dc.subject.proposalTratamiento de erroresspa
dc.subject.proposalRetroalimentación entre paresspa
dc.subject.proposalHabilidades de escrituraspa
dc.subject.proposalLos procesos de aprendizaje de idiomas, enseñanza de ESL.spa
dc.subject.subjectenglishError treatmenteng
dc.subject.subjectenglishpeer feedbackeng
dc.subject.subjectenglishwriting skillseng
dc.subject.subjectenglishteaching and learning in EFL classroom.eng
dc.titlePeer Feedback: A strategy based on error treatment to enhance writing skills in EFL classroomspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.type.localTesis de Maestríaspa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
PEER FEEDBACK.pdf
Tamaño:
1.57 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
FigueroaVegaNeylaEdith2015
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Neyla E. Figueroa V. y Adriana G. Merchan.pdf
Tamaño:
797.07 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: